Evaluating Research:
Table of Contents/Headings
When glancing down the table of contents in a book or the headings in an article, you should ask yourself the following questions:
- What topics are covered?
- What topics are missing?
- What is the tone of the chapter or heading titles?
Your better quality publications will tend to have clear, straightforward titles and headers that make it easy for you to locate information in the publication.
Discussion
It would take only about two minutes glancing at the table of contents of Audrey J. Roth's The Research Paper: Process, Form, and Content to conclude that it is likely a credible sources because Roth covers the important concepts of the process. Use of the word "likely" in the previous sentence is not meant to imply that there is something wrong with Roth's text or that further examination will uncover a serious flaw. Instead, "likely" is used because a quick glance in not sufficient to make a firm conclusion.
Special Note on Dates
>Since Roth published her book, both the Modern Language Association and the American Psychological Association have changed their citation guidelines. Although the general research strategies presented in her book are still credible, much of the information she provides is no longer current. As a result, even though the table of contents suggests credibility, the date does not.
Search the Table of Contents at Amazon.com
One of the wonderful features of Amazon.com is that you can often browse a book’s table of contents before you buy it.
This feature can also be an effective research strategy because, by scanning a book’s contents, you get an idea about a book’s quality before you track down a copy of it. Or, by scanning the book at Amazon.com, you can get ideas for your research.
If you have not used this feature before, you might want to scan Joe Cummings’ Sri Lanka.
| 
